Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] vs [LAVA UPD] Hunt Giant Fish
Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] currently leads with 1,448 concurrent players against 220, a 6.6× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] at 2,386 concurrent players, versus 1,678. Momentum favours Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS]: +11.8% week over week versus -16.9% for [LAVA UPD] Hunt Giant Fish. Lifetime, Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] has more visits (98.2M vs 21.7M). Full side-by-side history for Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] and [LAVA UPD] Hunt Giant Fish is charted above.
Player count history
Head to head
| Metric | Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] | [LAVA UPD] Hunt Giant Fish | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 1,448 | 220 | 1,228 (6.6×) |
| 24h peak | 1,992 | 769 | 1,223 (2.6×) |
| 24h average | 1,663 | 429 | 1,234 (3.9×) |
| 7-day peak | 2,378 | 1,479 | 899 (1.6×) |
| 7-day average | 1,658 | 743 | 915 (2.2×) |
| 30-day peak | 2,378 | 1,479 | 899 (1.6×) |
| All-time peak | 2,386 | 1,678 | 708 |
| 24h change | ▼ 10.1% | ▼ 26.9% | — |
| 7d change | ▲ 11.8% | ▼ 16.9% | — |
| Total visits | 98.2M | 21.7M | 76.5M (4.5×) |
| Visits (24h) | 132.2K | 59.2K | 73K (2.2×) |
| Visits (7d) | 934.4K | 584.4K | 350K (1.6×) |
| Favorites | 1.8M | 201K | 1.6M (8.8×) |
| Rating | 91.4% | 97.5% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #1,041 | #2,918 | of 8,283 |
| Trending score | 1.0 | -108.0 | — |
| Created | Jun 30, 2017 | Nov 18, 2025 | — |
| Genre | Simulation | Simulation | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 12 days for Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS], 9 for [LAVA UPD] Hunt Giant Fish.