Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] vs Build To Survive DISASTERS!

Build To Survive DISASTERS! currently leads with 2,386 concurrent players against 1,903. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build To Survive DISASTERS! at 4,824 concurrent players, versus 2,386. Momentum favours Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS]: +13.3% week over week versus -25.5% for Build To Survive DISASTERS!. Lifetime, Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] has more visits (98.2M vs 35.3M). Full side-by-side history for Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] and Build To Survive DISASTERS! is charted above.

Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS]
1,903
playing now
2,143 24h peak · 98.2M visits
VS
Build To Survive DISASTERS! 🌊
2,386
playing now
3,179 24h peak · 35.3M visits

Player count history

Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS]Build To Survive DISASTERS!

Head to head

Metric Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] Build To Survive DISASTERS!Difference
Playing now1,9032,386483
24h peak2,1433,1791,036
24h average1,7772,414637
7-day peak2,3783,5011,123
7-day average1,6762,353677
30-day peak2,3783,9911,613 (1.7×)
All-time peak2,3864,8242,438 (2.0×)
24h change 0.2% 7.8%
7d change 13.3% 25.5%
Total visits98.2M35.3M62.9M (2.8×)
Visits (24h)131.4K217.5K86.1K (1.7×)
Visits (7d)932.4K1.5M582.9K (1.6×)
Favorites1.8M995.4K782.3K (1.8×)
Rating91.4%95.5%
Global rank (players)#1,007#845of 8,195
Trending score19.38.7
CreatedJun 30, 2017May 24, 2025
GenreSimulationSurvival

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 12 days for Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS], 12 for Build To Survive DISASTERS!.