Digital Piano vs Ball Eating Simulator

Digital Piano currently leads with 303 concurrent players against 186, a 1.6× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Digital Piano at 523 concurrent players, versus 468. Momentum favours Digital Piano: +26.5% week over week versus -2.9% for Ball Eating Simulator. Lifetime, Ball Eating Simulator has more visits (116.5M vs 57M). Full side-by-side history for Digital Piano and Ball Eating Simulator is charted above.

Digital Piano 🎹
303
playing now
523 24h peak · 57M visits
VS
Ball Eating Simulator
186
playing now
373 24h peak · 116.5M visits

Player count history

Digital PianoBall Eating Simulator

Head to head

Metric Digital Piano Ball Eating SimulatorDifference
Playing now303186117 (1.6×)
24h peak523373150
24h average377263114
7-day peak523419104
7-day average31026842
30-day peak523419104
All-time peak52346855
24h change 0.8% 4.7%
7d change 26.5% 2.9%
Total visits57M116.5M59.5M (2.0×)
Visits (24h)53.8K48.9K4.9K
Visits (7d)314K343.3K29.3K
Favorites1.2M6.8M5.5M (5.5×)
Rating85.9%91.8%
Global rank (players)#2,240#2,893of 8,338
Trending score51.8-4.2
CreatedFeb 17, 2022Nov 14, 2023
GenreEntertainmentSimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 14 days for Digital Piano, 14 for Ball Eating Simulator.