Viral Emotes Testing vs Pure Soccer

Viral Emotes Testing currently leads with 2,036 concurrent players against 1,202, a 1.7× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Viral Emotes Testing at 2,262 concurrent players, versus 1,290. Lifetime, Pure Soccer has more visits (39.8M vs 1.6M). Full side-by-side history for Viral Emotes Testing and Pure Soccer is charted above.

Viral Emotes Testing
2,036
playing now
2,262 24h peak · 1.6M visits
VS
⚽ Pure Soccer
1,202
playing now
1,261 24h peak · 39.8M visits

Player count history

Viral Emotes TestingPure Soccer

Head to head

Metric Viral Emotes Testing Pure SoccerDifference
Playing now2,0361,202834 (1.7×)
24h peak2,2621,2611,001 (1.8×)
24h average1,8811,025856 (1.8×)
7-day peak2,2621,290972 (1.8×)
7-day average1,881957924 (2.0×)
30-day peak2,2621,290972 (1.8×)
All-time peak2,2621,290972 (1.8×)
24h change 15.3%
7d change
Total visits1.6M39.8M38.3M (25.5×)
Visits (24h)105.6K107.6K2K
Visits (7d)105.6K415.5K309.9K (3.9×)
Favorites4.5K628.6K624.1K (141.1×)
Rating74.0%81.3%
Global rank (players)#861#1,300of 4,573
Trending score0.020.9
CreatedJul 1, 2026Jun 16, 2025
GenreSocialSports & Racing

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 1 days for Viral Emotes Testing, 5 for Pure Soccer.

Viral Emotes Testing vs Pure Soccer — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals