Viral Emotes Testing vs Total Conquest WW2 [Beta]

Viral Emotes Testing currently leads with 2,050 concurrent players against 1,188, a 1.7× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Viral Emotes Testing at 2,050 concurrent players, versus 1,188. Lifetime, Viral Emotes Testing has more visits (1.5M vs 1.1M). Full side-by-side history for Viral Emotes Testing and Total Conquest WW2 [Beta] is charted above.

Viral Emotes Testing
2,050
playing now
2,022 24h peak · 1.5M visits
VS
Total Conquest WW2 [Beta]
1,188
playing now
1,177 24h peak · 1.1M visits

Player count history

Viral Emotes TestingTotal Conquest WW2 [Beta]

Head to head

Metric Viral Emotes Testing Total Conquest WW2 [Beta]Difference
Playing now2,0501,188862 (1.7×)
24h peak2,0221,177845 (1.7×)
24h average1,526947579 (1.6×)
7-day peak2,0221,177845 (1.7×)
7-day average1,526574952 (2.7×)
30-day peak2,0221,177845 (1.7×)
All-time peak2,0501,188862 (1.7×)
24h change 79.0%
7d change
Total visits1.5M1.1M399.4K
Visits (24h)64.2K171K106.8K (2.7×)
Visits (7d)64.2K399.7K335.5K (6.2×)
Favorites4.3K6.1K1.8K
Rating74.1%87.0%
Global rank (players)#961#1,355of 4,576
Trending score0.0185.6
CreatedJul 1, 2026Jul 29, 2026
GenreSocialStrategy

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 1 days for Viral Emotes Testing, 4 for Total Conquest WW2 [Beta].

Viral Emotes Testing vs Total Conquest WW2 [Beta] — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals