Viral Emotes Testing vs [] +1 Health Per Click

Viral Emotes Testing currently leads with 2,204 concurrent players against 761, a 2.9Γ— advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Viral Emotes Testing at 2,252 concurrent players, versus 1,241. Lifetime, [] +1 Health Per Click has more visits (58.7M vs 1.5M). Full side-by-side history for Viral Emotes Testing and [] +1 Health Per Click is charted above.

Viral Emotes Testing
2,204
playing now
2,252 24h peak Β· 1.5M visits
VS
[πŸ’–] +1 Health Per Click
761
playing now
1,241 24h peak Β· 58.7M visits

Player count history

Viral Emotes Testing[] +1 Health Per Click

Head to head

Metric Viral Emotes Testing [] +1 Health Per ClickDifference
Playing now2,2047611,443 (2.9Γ—)
24h peak2,2521,2411,011 (1.8Γ—)
24h average1,8498121,037 (2.3Γ—)
7-day peak2,2521,2411,011 (1.8Γ—)
7-day average1,8494341,415 (4.3Γ—)
30-day peak2,2521,2411,011 (1.8Γ—)
All-time peak2,2521,2411,011 (1.8Γ—)
24h changeβ€”β–² 57.4%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits1.5M58.7M57.1M (37.9Γ—)
Visits (24h)91.5K90.8K726
Visits (7d)91.5K252.9K161.3K (2.8Γ—)
Favorites4.4K2.8M2.8M (631.3Γ—)
Rating74.1%97.8%β€”
Global rank (players)#856#1,631of 4,575
Trending score0.0240.1β€”
CreatedJul 1, 2026Feb 19, 2026β€”
GenreSocialSimulationβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 1 days for Viral Emotes Testing, 5 for [] +1 Health Per Click.

Viral Emotes Testing vs [] +1 Health Per Click β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals