PLS DONATE vs BUILD AND HIDE TO SURVIVE
BUILD AND HIDE TO SURVIVE currently leads with 3,309 concurrent players against 3,118. On all-time peak the record belongs to PLS DONATE at 5,362 concurrent players, versus 4,261. Momentum favours PLS DONATE: -2.7% week over week versus -3.9% for BUILD AND HIDE TO SURVIVE. Lifetime, PLS DONATE has more visits (5.2B vs 35.1M). Full side-by-side history for PLS DONATE and BUILD AND HIDE TO SURVIVE is charted above.
PLS DONATE 💸
3,118
playing now
4,637 24h peak · 5.2B visits
VS
BUILD AND HIDE TO SURVIVE
3,309
playing now
4,261 24h peak · 35.1M visits
Player count history
PLS DONATEBUILD AND HIDE TO SURVIVE
Head to head
| Metric | PLS DONATE | BUILD AND HIDE TO SURVIVE | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 3,118 | 3,309 | 191 |
| 24h peak | 4,637 | 4,261 | 376 |
| 24h average | 3,664 | 3,413 | 251 |
| 7-day peak | 4,870 | 4,261 | 609 |
| 7-day average | 3,704 | 2,996 | 708 |
| 30-day peak | 4,870 | 4,261 | 609 |
| All-time peak | 5,362 | 4,261 | 1,101 |
| 24h change | ▲ 0.7% | ▲ 15.4% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 2.7% | ▼ 3.9% | — |
| Total visits | 5.2B | 35.1M | 5.2B (148.4×) |
| Visits (24h) | 863.9K | 284.9K | 578.9K (3.0×) |
| Visits (7d) | 6M | 1.8M | 4.3M (3.4×) |
| Favorites | 4.4M | 49.7K | 4.4M (88.6×) |
| Rating | 93.0% | 81.4% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #483 | #456 | of 8,339 |
| Trending score | -3.8 | 48.8 | — |
| Created | Feb 5, 2022 | May 10, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Social | Survival | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 14 days for PLS DONATE, 13 for BUILD AND HIDE TO SURVIVE.