Eternal Towers of Hell vs ZOO or OOF 2
ZOO or OOF 2 currently leads with 2,855 concurrent players against 1,770, a 1.6× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to ZOO or OOF 2 at 3,508 concurrent players, versus 2,373. Momentum favours ZOO or OOF 2: +116.1% week over week versus +2.9% for Eternal Towers of Hell. Lifetime, Eternal Towers of Hell has more visits (115.6M vs 2.7M). Full side-by-side history for Eternal Towers of Hell and ZOO or OOF 2 is charted above.
Eternal Towers of Hell
1,770
playing now
1,947 24h peak · 115.6M visits
VS
ZOO or OOF 2💥
2,855
playing now
2,605 24h peak · 2.7M visits
Player count history
Eternal Towers of HellZOO or OOF 2
Head to head
| Metric | Eternal Towers of Hell | ZOO or OOF 2 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 1,770 | 2,855 | 1,085 (1.6×) |
| 24h peak | 1,947 | 2,605 | 658 |
| 24h average | 1,667 | 2,185 | 518 |
| 7-day peak | 2,366 | 3,352 | 986 |
| 7-day average | 1,641 | 2,109 | 468 |
| 30-day peak | 2,366 | 3,352 | 986 |
| All-time peak | 2,373 | 3,508 | 1,135 |
| 24h change | ▲ 9.6% | ▼ 5.1% | — |
| 7d change | ▲ 2.9% | ▲ 116.1% | — |
| Total visits | 115.6M | 2.7M | 112.9M (42.7×) |
| Visits (24h) | 110.2K | 204K | 93.8K (1.9×) |
| Visits (7d) | 880.2K | 1.7M | 807.5K (1.9×) |
| Favorites | 189.3K | 9.5K | 179.8K (19.9×) |
| Rating | 79.8% | 83.3% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #880 | #633 | of 7,127 |
| Trending score | 5.0 | 11.9 | — |
| Created | Jan 17, 2022 | Jul 27, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Obby & Platformer | Party & Casual | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 10 days for Eternal Towers of Hell, 9 for ZOO or OOF 2.