Eternal Towers of Hell vs The Classic Soccer

The Classic Soccer currently leads with 3,957 concurrent players against 1,626, a 2.4× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to The Classic Soccer at 6,670 concurrent players, versus 2,394. Momentum favours Eternal Towers of Hell: +0.4% week over week versus -18.2% for The Classic Soccer. Lifetime, Eternal Towers of Hell has more visits (115.9M vs 101.4M). Full side-by-side history for Eternal Towers of Hell and The Classic Soccer is charted above.

Eternal Towers of Hell
1,626
playing now
2,394 24h peak · 115.9M visits
VS
The Classic Soccer
3,957
playing now
5,015 24h peak · 101.4M visits

Player count history

Eternal Towers of HellThe Classic Soccer

Head to head

Metric Eternal Towers of Hell The Classic SoccerDifference
Playing now1,6263,9572,331 (2.4×)
24h peak2,3945,0152,621 (2.1×)
24h average1,7583,5681,810 (2.0×)
7-day peak2,3946,6234,229 (2.8×)
7-day average1,6242,7591,135 (1.7×)
30-day peak2,3946,6704,276 (2.8×)
All-time peak2,3946,6704,276 (2.8×)
24h change 12.3% 44.1%
7d change 0.4% 18.2%
Total visits115.9M101.4M14.5M
Visits (24h)128K285.4K157.4K (2.2×)
Visits (7d)871.9K1.9M988K (2.1×)
Favorites189.7K33.9K155.8K (5.6×)
Rating79.8%84.3%
Global rank (players)#1,021#438of 7,928
Trending score26.4103.3
CreatedJan 17, 2022Jun 5, 2023
GenreObby & PlatformerSports & Racing

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for Eternal Towers of Hell, 13 for The Classic Soccer.