Eternal Towers of Hell vs [] MOUNT RNG

[] MOUNT RNG currently leads with 1,971 concurrent players against 1,708. On all-time peak the record belongs to [] MOUNT RNG at 2,315 concurrent players, versus 2,208. Lifetime, Eternal Towers of Hell has more visits (114.9M vs 68.6M). Full side-by-side history for Eternal Towers of Hell and [] MOUNT RNG is charted above.

Eternal Towers of Hell
1,708
playing now
2,120 24h peak Β· 114.9M visits
VS
[🐲] MOUNT RNG
1,971
playing now
2,272 24h peak Β· 68.6M visits

Player count history

Eternal Towers of Hell[] MOUNT RNG

Head to head

Metric Eternal Towers of Hell [] MOUNT RNGDifference
Playing now1,7081,971263
24h peak2,1202,272152
24h average1,6561,841185
7-day peak2,2082,315107
7-day average1,6091,952343
30-day peak2,2082,315107
All-time peak2,2082,315107
24h changeβ–² 19.0%β–Ό 9.0%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits114.9M68.6M46.2M (1.7Γ—)
Visits (24h)119.9K108.4K11.5K
Visits (7d)391.1K393.4K2.3K
Favorites187.9K129.7K58.2K
Rating79.7%95.5%β€”
Global rank (players)#863#767of 4,278
Trending score9.3-18.4β€”
CreatedJan 17, 2022Aug 25, 2024β€”
GenreObby & PlatformerSimulationβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 4 days for Eternal Towers of Hell, 4 for [] MOUNT RNG.

Eternal Towers of Hell vs [] MOUNT RNG β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals