[NEW AREA ] Eternal Towers of Hell vs Animal Sim: Underwater

[NEW AREA ] Eternal Towers of Hell currently leads with 2,586 concurrent players against 970, a 2.7× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [NEW AREA ] Eternal Towers of Hell at 7,200 concurrent players, versus 1,579. Momentum favours [NEW AREA ] Eternal Towers of Hell: +11.1% week over week versus +6.3% for Animal Sim: Underwater. Lifetime, Animal Sim: Underwater has more visits (265.8M vs 116.1M). Full side-by-side history for [NEW AREA ] Eternal Towers of Hell and Animal Sim: Underwater is charted above.

[NEW AREA 🌙] Eternal Towers of Hell
2,586
playing now
7,200 24h peak · 116.1M visits
VS
Animal Sim: Underwater
970
playing now
1,405 24h peak · 265.8M visits

Player count history

[NEW AREA ] Eternal Towers of HellAnimal Sim: Underwater

Head to head

Metric [NEW AREA ] Eternal Towers of Hell Animal Sim: UnderwaterDifference
Playing now2,5869701,616 (2.7×)
24h peak7,2001,4055,795 (5.1×)
24h average2,6591,0781,581 (2.5×)
7-day peak7,2001,5795,621 (4.6×)
7-day average1,813984829 (1.8×)
30-day peak7,2001,5795,621 (4.6×)
All-time peak7,2001,5795,621 (4.6×)
24h change 47.1% 7.1%
7d change 11.1% 6.3%
Total visits116.1M265.8M149.8M (2.3×)
Visits (24h)171.4K124.9K46.5K
Visits (7d)905.8K834.2K71.7K
Favorites190K226K36K
Rating79.8%84.8%
Global rank (players)#622#1,364of 8,283
Trending score157.728.3
CreatedJan 17, 2022Apr 13, 2023
GenreObby & PlatformerRoleplay & Avatar Sim

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for [NEW AREA ] Eternal Towers of Hell, 13 for Animal Sim: Underwater.