[APRIL FOOL'S] AA vs [UPD] Cut a Gem
[UPD] Cut a Gem currently leads with 827 concurrent players against 182, a 4.5× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [UPD] Cut a Gem at 4,114 concurrent players, versus 325. Momentum favours [UPD] Cut a Gem: -14.1% week over week versus -14.9% for [APRIL FOOL'S] AA. Lifetime, [APRIL FOOL'S] AA has more visits (2.5B vs 10.9M). Full side-by-side history for [APRIL FOOL'S] AA and [UPD] Cut a Gem is charted above.
[🤹APRIL FOOL'S🤡] AA
182
playing now
313 24h peak · 2.5B visits
VS
[🔥UPD] Cut a Gem
827
playing now
1,865 24h peak · 10.9M visits
Player count history
[APRIL FOOL'S] AA[UPD] Cut a Gem
Head to head
| Metric | [APRIL FOOL'S] AA | [UPD] Cut a Gem | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 182 | 827 | 645 (4.5×) |
| 24h peak | 313 | 1,865 | 1,552 (6.0×) |
| 24h average | 208 | 1,232 | 1,024 (5.9×) |
| 7-day peak | 313 | 2,233 | 1,920 (7.1×) |
| 7-day average | 200 | 1,311 | 1,111 (6.6×) |
| 30-day peak | 313 | 2,233 | 1,920 (7.1×) |
| All-time peak | 325 | 4,114 | 3,789 (12.7×) |
| 24h change | ▲ 4.0% | ▲ 24.8% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 14.9% | ▼ 14.1% | — |
| Total visits | 2.5B | 10.9M | 2.5B (230.9×) |
| Visits (24h) | 20.1K | 114.4K | 94.2K (5.7×) |
| Visits (7d) | 138K | 856.2K | 718.2K (6.2×) |
| Favorites | 1.4M | 369.1K | 1M (3.8×) |
| Rating | 91.7% | 97.4% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #3,161 | #1,549 | of 7,866 |
| Trending score | 8.3 | -18.3 | — |
| Created | Dec 21, 2021 | May 23, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Strategy | Simulation | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 10 days for [APRIL FOOL'S] AA, 12 for [UPD] Cut a Gem.