Depth Spelunking vs Try To Die
Try To Die currently leads with 1,064 concurrent players against 753. On all-time peak the record belongs to Try To Die at 1,626 concurrent players, versus 1,226. Momentum favours Depth Spelunking: -34.7% week over week versus -46.0% for Try To Die. Lifetime, Try To Die has more visits (46.3M vs 22M). Full side-by-side history for Depth Spelunking and Try To Die is charted above.
Depth Spelunking
753
playing now
753 24h peak · 22M visits
VS
Try To Die 💀
1,064
playing now
1,246 24h peak · 46.3M visits
Player count history
Depth SpelunkingTry To Die
Head to head
| Metric | Depth Spelunking | Try To Die | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 753 | 1,064 | 311 |
| 24h peak | 753 | 1,246 | 493 (1.7×) |
| 24h average | 624 | 921 | 297 |
| 7-day peak | 1,050 | 1,246 | 196 |
| 7-day average | 616 | 512 | 104 |
| 30-day peak | 1,226 | 1,626 | 400 |
| All-time peak | 1,226 | 1,626 | 400 |
| 24h change | ▲ 16.0% | ▲ 179.1% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 34.7% | ▼ 46.0% | — |
| Total visits | 22M | 46.3M | 24.4M (2.1×) |
| Visits (24h) | 35.9K | 68.1K | 32.1K (1.9×) |
| Visits (7d) | 284.9K | 296.6K | 11.7K |
| Favorites | 208.9K | 2.3M | 2.1M (10.9×) |
| Rating | 92.8% | 82.3% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #1,778 | #1,465 | of 7,866 |
| Trending score | 3.5 | 226.1 | — |
| Created | Dec 14, 2021 | Apr 13, 2023 | — |
| Genre | Survival | Puzzle | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 12 days for Depth Spelunking, 12 for Try To Die.