Fast Fredbear [AI] vs Burn A City
Fast Fredbear [AI] currently leads with 128 concurrent players against 63, a 2.0Γ advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Fast Fredbear [AI] at 156 concurrent players, versus 144. Lifetime, Fast Fredbear [AI] has more visits (22.3M vs 6.2M). Full side-by-side history for Fast Fredbear [AI] and Burn A City is charted above.
Fast Fredbear [AI]
128
playing now
149 24h peak Β· 22.3M visits
VS
π₯ Burn A City
63
playing now
96 24h peak Β· 6.2M visits
Player count history
Fast Fredbear [AI]Burn A City
Head to head
| Metric | Fast Fredbear [AI] | Burn A City | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 128 | 63 | 65 (2.0Γ) |
| 24h peak | 149 | 96 | 53 (1.6Γ) |
| 24h average | 95 | 49 | 46 (1.9Γ) |
| 7-day peak | 149 | 144 | 5 |
| 7-day average | 101 | 52 | 49 (1.9Γ) |
| 30-day peak | 149 | 144 | 5 |
| All-time peak | 156 | 144 | 12 |
| 24h change | βΌ 21.5% | βΌ 9.3% | β |
| 7d change | β | β | β |
| Total visits | 22.3M | 6.2M | 16.1M (3.6Γ) |
| Visits (24h) | 17.1K | 6.9K | 10.2K (2.5Γ) |
| Visits (7d) | 27.4K | 35.2K | 7.7K |
| Favorites | 64.4K | 13.8K | 50.6K (4.7Γ) |
| Rating | 81.5% | 90.1% | β |
| Global rank (players) | #3,531 | #4,144 | of 7,662 |
| Trending score | -9.6 | -6.9 | β |
| Created | Nov 15, 2025 | Feb 27, 2026 | β |
| Genre | Survival | Simulation | β |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β 3 days for Fast Fredbear [AI], 6 for Burn A City.