Eat Blobs Simulator vs Surf for Lucky Blocks

Surf for Lucky Blocks currently leads with 2,163 concurrent players against 1,205, a 1.8× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Surf for Lucky Blocks at 2,649 concurrent players, versus 1,616. Lifetime, Eat Blobs Simulator has more visits (240.2M vs 34.7M). Full side-by-side history for Eat Blobs Simulator and Surf for Lucky Blocks is charted above.

Eat Blobs Simulator
1,205
playing now
1,616 24h peak · 240.2M visits
VS
Surf for Lucky Blocks
2,163
playing now
2,649 24h peak · 34.7M visits

Player count history

Eat Blobs SimulatorSurf for Lucky Blocks

Head to head

Metric Eat Blobs Simulator Surf for Lucky BlocksDifference
Playing now1,2052,163958 (1.8×)
24h peak1,6162,6491,033 (1.6×)
24h average1,0121,867855 (1.8×)
7-day peak1,6162,6491,033 (1.6×)
7-day average8171,807990 (2.2×)
30-day peak1,6162,6491,033 (1.6×)
All-time peak1,6162,6491,033 (1.6×)
24h change 13.7% 15.9%
7d change
Total visits240.2M34.7M205.5M (6.9×)
Visits (24h)126.1K183.6K57.5K
Visits (7d)468.5K449.6K18.9K
Favorites1.3M1.4M125.3K
Rating77.3%88.3%
Global rank (players)#1,281#877of 4,743
Trending score69.710.7
CreatedDec 8, 2021Mar 31, 2026
GenreSimulationSimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 5 days for Eat Blobs Simulator, 3 for Surf for Lucky Blocks.

Eat Blobs Simulator vs Surf for Lucky Blocks — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals