Eat Blobs Simulator vs FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB

FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB currently leads with 877 concurrent players against 524, a 1.7× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Eat Blobs Simulator at 1,799 concurrent players, versus 1,769. Momentum favours Eat Blobs Simulator: +11.1% week over week versus -16.0% for FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB. Lifetime, Eat Blobs Simulator has more visits (241.3M vs 7.4M). Full side-by-side history for Eat Blobs Simulator and FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB is charted above.

Eat Blobs Simulator
524
playing now
1,175 24h peak · 241.3M visits
VS
😡 FAST WAVE 😡 X99999999 ETFB
877
playing now
1,769 24h peak · 7.4M visits

Player count history

Eat Blobs SimulatorFAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB

Head to head

Metric Eat Blobs Simulator FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFBDifference
Playing now524877353 (1.7×)
24h peak1,1751,769594 (1.5×)
24h average8331,231398
7-day peak1,7321,76937
7-day average9631,066103
30-day peak1,7321,76937
All-time peak1,7991,76930
24h change 31.8% 3.4%
7d change 11.1% 16.0%
Total visits241.3M7.4M233.9M (32.6×)
Visits (24h)109.6K195.5K85.9K (1.8×)
Visits (7d)878.4K1.1M254.8K
Favorites1.3M802.8K480.2K (1.6×)
Rating77.3%81.7%
Global rank (players)#2,001#1,528of 8,283
Trending score-38.546.8
CreatedDec 8, 2021Apr 24, 2026
GenreSimulationSimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for Eat Blobs Simulator, 10 for FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB.