Eat Blobs Simulator vs Survived 67 Days - Monster Forest

Eat Blobs Simulator currently leads with 991 concurrent players against 608, a 1.6× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Survived 67 Days - Monster Forest at 1,938 concurrent players, versus 1,799. Momentum favours Eat Blobs Simulator: +15.4% week over week versus -17.4% for Survived 67 Days - Monster Forest. Lifetime, Eat Blobs Simulator has more visits (241.3M vs 27.1M). Full side-by-side history for Eat Blobs Simulator and Survived 67 Days - Monster Forest is charted above.

Eat Blobs Simulator
991
playing now
1,201 24h peak · 241.3M visits
VS
⚔️ Survived 67 Days - Monster Forest 🐺
608
playing now
1,749 24h peak · 27.1M visits

Player count history

Eat Blobs SimulatorSurvived 67 Days - Monster Forest

Head to head

Metric Eat Blobs Simulator Survived 67 Days - Monster ForestDifference
Playing now991608383 (1.6×)
24h peak1,2011,749548
24h average9621,00038
7-day peak1,7321,74917
7-day average9911,0009
30-day peak1,7321,74917
All-time peak1,7991,938139
24h change 19.4% 1.0%
7d change 15.4% 17.4%
Total visits241.3M27.1M214.2M (8.9×)
Visits (24h)118.8K146K27.3K
Visits (7d)892.8K953K60.2K
Favorites1.3M23.6K1.3M (54.4×)
Rating77.3%91.8%
Global rank (players)#1,575#2,059of 8,195
Trending score-8.50.0
CreatedDec 8, 2021Oct 21, 2025
GenreSimulationSurvival

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for Eat Blobs Simulator, 9 for Survived 67 Days - Monster Forest.