Eat Blobs Simulator vs Interliminality (ALPHA 1.3.6)

Interliminality (ALPHA 1.3.6) currently leads with 1,830 concurrent players against 800, a 2.3× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Interliminality (ALPHA 1.3.6) at 2,144 concurrent players, versus 1,616. Lifetime, Eat Blobs Simulator has more visits (240.3M vs 88.9M). Full side-by-side history for Eat Blobs Simulator and Interliminality (ALPHA 1.3.6) is charted above.

Eat Blobs Simulator
800
playing now
1,616 24h peak · 240.3M visits
VS
Interliminality (ALPHA 1.3.6)
1,830
playing now
2,144 24h peak · 88.9M visits

Player count history

Eat Blobs SimulatorInterliminality (ALPHA 1.3.6)

Head to head

Metric Eat Blobs Simulator Interliminality (ALPHA 1.3.6)Difference
Playing now8001,8301,030 (2.3×)
24h peak1,6162,144528
24h average9631,656693 (1.7×)
7-day peak1,6162,144528
7-day average7981,361563 (1.7×)
30-day peak1,6162,144528
All-time peak1,6162,144528
24h change 5.7% 15.3%
7d change
Total visits240.3M88.9M151.4M (2.7×)
Visits (24h)138K99.4K38.5K
Visits (7d)503.6K367.3K136.3K
Favorites1.3M869.4K401.9K
Rating77.3%92.4%
Global rank (players)#1,535#949of 5,050
Trending score59.968.6
CreatedDec 8, 2021Jul 29, 2023
GenreSimulationAdventure

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 6 days for Eat Blobs Simulator, 6 for Interliminality (ALPHA 1.3.6).

Eat Blobs Simulator vs Interliminality (ALPHA 1.3.6) — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals