Eat Blobs Simulator vs ZOO or OOF

ZOO or OOF currently leads with 1,066 concurrent players against 767. On all-time peak the record belongs to Eat Blobs Simulator at 1,799 concurrent players, versus 1,798. Momentum favours Eat Blobs Simulator: +26.7% week over week versus -0.9% for ZOO or OOF. Lifetime, Eat Blobs Simulator has more visits (241.2M vs 236.5M). Full side-by-side history for Eat Blobs Simulator and ZOO or OOF is charted above.

Eat Blobs Simulator
767
playing now
1,791 24h peak · 241.2M visits
VS
ZOO or OOF🎯
1,066
playing now
1,571 24h peak · 236.5M visits

Player count history

Eat Blobs SimulatorZOO or OOF

Head to head

Metric Eat Blobs Simulator ZOO or OOFDifference
Playing now7671,066299
24h peak1,7911,571220
24h average1,0651,08722
7-day peak1,7941,7984
7-day average1,0191,162143
30-day peak1,7941,7984
All-time peak1,7991,7981
24h change 7.6% 0.6%
7d change 26.7% 0.9%
Total visits241.2M236.5M4.7M
Visits (24h)143.2K141.6K1.6K
Visits (7d)928.3K1.1M144.1K
Favorites1.3M6.3M5.1M (4.9×)
Rating77.3%95.0%
Global rank (players)#1,581#1,253of 8,019
Trending score13.4-19.2
CreatedDec 8, 2021May 27, 2025
GenreSimulationParty & Casual

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for Eat Blobs Simulator, 13 for ZOO or OOF.