Eat Blobs Simulator vs Try To Die

Eat Blobs Simulator currently leads with 1,180 concurrent players against 495, a 2.4Γ— advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Try To Die at 1,626 concurrent players, versus 1,616. Lifetime, Eat Blobs Simulator has more visits (240.2M vs 46M). Full side-by-side history for Eat Blobs Simulator and Try To Die is charted above.

Eat Blobs Simulator
1,180
playing now
1,616 24h peak Β· 240.2M visits
VS
Try To Die πŸ’€
495
playing now
708 24h peak Β· 46M visits

Player count history

Eat Blobs SimulatorTry To Die

Head to head

Metric Eat Blobs Simulator Try To DieDifference
Playing now1,180495685 (2.4Γ—)
24h peak1,616708908 (2.3Γ—)
24h average1,046497549 (2.1Γ—)
7-day peak1,6161,62610
7-day average827931104
30-day peak1,6161,62610
All-time peak1,6161,62610
24h changeβ–² 16.9%β–Ό 6.8%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits240.2M46M194.2M (5.2Γ—)
Visits (24h)128.2K44.2K84K (2.9Γ—)
Visits (7d)475.4K277.2K198.2K (1.7Γ—)
Favorites1.3M2.3M1M (1.8Γ—)
Rating77.3%82.4%β€”
Global rank (players)#1,301#1,929of 4,743
Trending score77.7-122.8β€”
CreatedDec 8, 2021Apr 13, 2023β€”
GenreSimulationPuzzleβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 5 days for Eat Blobs Simulator, 5 for Try To Die.

Eat Blobs Simulator vs Try To Die β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals