Eat Blobs Simulator vs Animal Sim: Underwater

Animal Sim: Underwater currently leads with 970 concurrent players against 524, a 1.9× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Eat Blobs Simulator at 1,799 concurrent players, versus 1,579. Momentum favours Eat Blobs Simulator: +11.1% week over week versus +6.3% for Animal Sim: Underwater. Lifetime, Animal Sim: Underwater has more visits (265.8M vs 241.3M). Full side-by-side history for Eat Blobs Simulator and Animal Sim: Underwater is charted above.

Eat Blobs Simulator
524
playing now
1,175 24h peak · 241.3M visits
VS
Animal Sim: Underwater
970
playing now
1,405 24h peak · 265.8M visits

Player count history

Eat Blobs SimulatorAnimal Sim: Underwater

Head to head

Metric Eat Blobs Simulator Animal Sim: UnderwaterDifference
Playing now524970446 (1.9×)
24h peak1,1751,405230
24h average8331,078245
7-day peak1,7321,579153
7-day average96398421
30-day peak1,7321,579153
All-time peak1,7991,579220
24h change 31.8% 7.1%
7d change 11.1% 6.3%
Total visits241.3M265.8M24.5M
Visits (24h)109.6K124.9K15.3K
Visits (7d)878.4K834.2K44.2K
Favorites1.3M226K1.1M (5.7×)
Rating77.3%84.8%
Global rank (players)#2,001#1,364of 8,283
Trending score-38.528.3
CreatedDec 8, 2021Apr 13, 2023
GenreSimulationRoleplay & Avatar Sim

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for Eat Blobs Simulator, 13 for Animal Sim: Underwater.