Eat Blobs Simulator vs WARDEN Survival Delver
WARDEN Survival Delver currently leads with 1,275 concurrent players against 372, a 3.4× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to WARDEN Survival Delver at 2,919 concurrent players, versus 1,799. Momentum favours Eat Blobs Simulator: +9.1% week over week versus -9.3% for WARDEN Survival Delver. Lifetime, Eat Blobs Simulator has more visits (241.3M vs 8.1M). Full side-by-side history for Eat Blobs Simulator and WARDEN Survival Delver is charted above.
Eat Blobs Simulator
372
playing now
1,175 24h peak · 241.3M visits
VS
WARDEN 🐲 Survival Delver
1,275
playing now
2,234 24h peak · 8.1M visits
Player count history
Eat Blobs SimulatorWARDEN Survival Delver
Head to head
| Metric | Eat Blobs Simulator | WARDEN Survival Delver | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 372 | 1,275 | 903 (3.4×) |
| 24h peak | 1,175 | 2,234 | 1,059 (1.9×) |
| 24h average | 735 | 1,651 | 916 (2.2×) |
| 7-day peak | 1,732 | 2,756 | 1,024 (1.6×) |
| 7-day average | 945 | 1,654 | 709 (1.8×) |
| 30-day peak | 1,732 | 2,841 | 1,109 (1.6×) |
| All-time peak | 1,799 | 2,919 | 1,120 (1.6×) |
| 24h change | ▼ 38.8% | ▼ 15.3% | — |
| 7d change | ▲ 9.1% | ▼ 9.3% | — |
| Total visits | 241.3M | 8.1M | 233.2M (29.9×) |
| Visits (24h) | 103.2K | 104.6K | 1.4K |
| Visits (7d) | 870.5K | 1M | 138.8K |
| Favorites | 1.3M | 242.2K | 1M (5.3×) |
| Rating | 77.3% | 93.0% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #2,004 | #937 | of 8,338 |
| Trending score | -62.2 | -0.6 | — |
| Created | Dec 8, 2021 | Dec 27, 2025 | — |
| Genre | Simulation | Survival | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 14 days for Eat Blobs Simulator, 14 for WARDEN Survival Delver.