Eat Blobs Simulator vs Train to Fight

Train to Fight currently leads with 2,472 concurrent players against 1,199, a 2.1× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Train to Fight at 4,040 concurrent players, versus 1,616. Lifetime, Eat Blobs Simulator has more visits (240.2M vs 186.1M). Full side-by-side history for Eat Blobs Simulator and Train to Fight is charted above.

Eat Blobs Simulator
1,199
playing now
1,616 24h peak · 240.2M visits
VS
Train to Fight
2,472
playing now
3,494 24h peak · 186.1M visits

Player count history

Eat Blobs SimulatorTrain to Fight

Head to head

Metric Eat Blobs Simulator Train to FightDifference
Playing now1,1992,4721,273 (2.1×)
24h peak1,6163,4941,878 (2.2×)
24h average1,0122,5801,568 (2.5×)
7-day peak1,6164,0302,414 (2.5×)
7-day average8172,6011,784 (3.2×)
30-day peak1,6164,0302,414 (2.5×)
All-time peak1,6164,0402,424 (2.5×)
24h change 13.7% 16.0%
7d change
Total visits240.2M186.1M54.1M
Visits (24h)126.1K319.3K193.2K (2.5×)
Visits (7d)468.5K1M544.9K (2.2×)
Favorites1.3M138.6K1.1M (9.2×)
Rating77.3%91.5%
Global rank (players)#1,281#739of 4,743
Trending score69.7-2.7
CreatedDec 8, 2021Feb 8, 2025
GenreSimulationSimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 5 days for Eat Blobs Simulator, 4 for Train to Fight.

Eat Blobs Simulator vs Train to Fight — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals