Eat Blobs Simulator vs FNAF: Eternal Nights

FNAF: Eternal Nights currently leads with 5,406 concurrent players against 1,164, a 4.6Γ— advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to FNAF: Eternal Nights at 5,983 concurrent players, versus 1,616. Lifetime, FNAF: Eternal Nights has more visits (313.7M vs 240.2M). Full side-by-side history for Eat Blobs Simulator and FNAF: Eternal Nights is charted above.

Eat Blobs Simulator
1,164
playing now
1,616 24h peak Β· 240.2M visits
VS
FNAF: Eternal Nights πŸ•
5,406
playing now
5,832 24h peak Β· 313.7M visits

Player count history

Eat Blobs SimulatorFNAF: Eternal Nights

Head to head

Metric Eat Blobs Simulator FNAF: Eternal NightsDifference
Playing now1,1645,4064,242 (4.6Γ—)
24h peak1,6165,8324,216 (3.6Γ—)
24h average1,0054,7033,698 (4.7Γ—)
7-day peak1,6165,9834,367 (3.7Γ—)
7-day average8144,3423,528 (5.3Γ—)
30-day peak1,6165,9834,367 (3.7Γ—)
All-time peak1,6165,9834,367 (3.7Γ—)
24h changeβ–² 12.9%β–² 16.0%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits240.2M313.7M73.5M
Visits (24h)124.9K555.5K430.6K (4.4Γ—)
Visits (7d)467.3K2.3M1.8M (4.9Γ—)
Favorites1.3M838.1K432.8K (1.5Γ—)
Rating77.3%94.4%β€”
Global rank (players)#1,324#338of 4,743
Trending score68.430.4β€”
CreatedDec 8, 2021Oct 27, 2022β€”
GenreSimulationSurvivalβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 5 days for Eat Blobs Simulator, 5 for FNAF: Eternal Nights.

Eat Blobs Simulator vs FNAF: Eternal Nights β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals