Eat Blobs Simulator vs [ WORKERS] Cut a Gem

[ WORKERS] Cut a Gem currently leads with 1,784 concurrent players against 1,085, a 1.6Γ— advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [ WORKERS] Cut a Gem at 2,191 concurrent players, versus 1,616. Lifetime, Eat Blobs Simulator has more visits (240.2M vs 10M). Full side-by-side history for Eat Blobs Simulator and [ WORKERS] Cut a Gem is charted above.

Eat Blobs Simulator
1,085
playing now
1,616 24h peak Β· 240.2M visits
VS
[πŸ‘· WORKERS] Cut a Gem
1,784
playing now
2,149 24h peak Β· 10M visits

Player count history

Eat Blobs Simulator[ WORKERS] Cut a Gem

Head to head

Metric Eat Blobs Simulator [ WORKERS] Cut a GemDifference
Playing now1,0851,784699 (1.6Γ—)
24h peak1,6162,149533
24h average1,0931,650557 (1.5Γ—)
7-day peak1,6162,191575
7-day average8341,529695 (1.8Γ—)
30-day peak1,6162,191575
All-time peak1,6162,191575
24h changeβ–² 23.5%β–² 24.2%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits240.2M10M230.3M (24.1Γ—)
Visits (24h)124.2K150.3K26.1K
Visits (7d)455.1K601.5K146.4K
Favorites1.3M342.4K928.5K (3.7Γ—)
Rating77.3%97.4%β€”
Global rank (players)#1,337#1,035of 4,573
Trending score91.725.1β€”
CreatedDec 8, 2021May 23, 2026β€”
GenreSimulationSimulationβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 5 days for Eat Blobs Simulator, 5 for [ WORKERS] Cut a Gem.

Eat Blobs Simulator vs [ WORKERS] Cut a Gem β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals