Eat Blobs Simulator vs Superstar Baseball

Superstar Baseball currently leads with 1,326 concurrent players against 372, a 3.6× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Superstar Baseball at 4,618 concurrent players, versus 1,799. Momentum favours Eat Blobs Simulator: +9.1% week over week versus -50.3% for Superstar Baseball. Lifetime, Eat Blobs Simulator has more visits (241.3M vs 97.1M). Full side-by-side history for Eat Blobs Simulator and Superstar Baseball is charted above.

Eat Blobs Simulator
372
playing now
1,175 24h peak · 241.3M visits
VS
Superstar Baseball
1,326
playing now
1,792 24h peak · 97.1M visits

Player count history

Eat Blobs SimulatorSuperstar Baseball

Head to head

Metric Eat Blobs Simulator Superstar BaseballDifference
Playing now3721,326954 (3.6×)
24h peak1,1751,792617 (1.5×)
24h average7331,319586 (1.8×)
7-day peak1,7322,132400
7-day average9451,270325
30-day peak1,7324,0432,311 (2.3×)
All-time peak1,7994,6182,819 (2.6×)
24h change 39.0% 5.8%
7d change 9.1% 50.3%
Total visits241.3M97.1M144.2M (2.5×)
Visits (24h)103.6K145.6K42K
Visits (7d)870.8K1.2M325.3K
Favorites1.3M227.3K1.1M (5.6×)
Rating77.3%92.4%
Global rank (players)#2,072#927of 8,338
Trending score-62.811.8
CreatedDec 8, 2021Jan 22, 2025
GenreSimulationSports & Racing

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 14 days for Eat Blobs Simulator, 14 for Superstar Baseball.