[UPD] Chicago, IL (Roleplay) vs Avatar Shopping
Avatar Shopping currently leads with 100 concurrent players against 17, a 5.9× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Avatar Shopping at 145 concurrent players, versus 75. Lifetime, Avatar Shopping has more visits (2.8M vs 2.4M). Full side-by-side history for [UPD] Chicago, IL (Roleplay) and Avatar Shopping is charted above.
[UPD] Chicago, IL (Roleplay)
17
playing now
75 24h peak · 2.4M visits
VS
Avatar Shopping
100
playing now
145 24h peak · 2.8M visits
Player count history
[UPD] Chicago, IL (Roleplay)Avatar Shopping
Head to head
| Metric | [UPD] Chicago, IL (Roleplay) | Avatar Shopping | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 17 | 100 | 83 (5.9×) |
| 24h peak | 75 | 145 | 70 (1.9×) |
| 24h average | 31 | 96 | 65 (3.1×) |
| 7-day peak | 75 | 145 | 70 (1.9×) |
| 7-day average | 35 | 94 | 59 (2.7×) |
| 30-day peak | 75 | 145 | 70 (1.9×) |
| All-time peak | 75 | 145 | 70 (1.9×) |
| 24h change | ▲ 6.9% | ▲ 3.2% | — |
| 7d change | — | — | — |
| Total visits | 2.4M | 2.8M | 408.6K |
| Visits (24h) | 3.5K | 12.7K | 9.2K (3.6×) |
| Visits (7d) | 11.9K | 30.7K | 18.8K (2.6×) |
| Favorites | 64.5K | 5.1K | 59.4K (12.5×) |
| Rating | 64.0% | 86.3% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #3,537 | #2,705 | of 4,425 |
| Trending score | -10.8 | 3.4 | — |
| Created | Oct 10, 2024 | Mar 3, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Roleplay & Avatar Sim | Shopping | — |
Other comparisons
[UPD] Chicago, IL (Roleplay) vs Zombie Defense[UPD] Chicago, IL (Roleplay) vs Defend your Box Fort from Monsters[UPD] Chicago, IL (Roleplay) vs Teen Titans Tycoon[UPD] Chicago, IL (Roleplay) vs Ice Scream: Freezing Horror[UPD] Chicago, IL (Roleplay) vs Bunny 64 [HORROR][UPD] Chicago, IL (Roleplay) vs [8 NEW CARS!] Cobb County, Florida | BETACompare two other games →
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 5 days for [UPD] Chicago, IL (Roleplay), 4 for Avatar Shopping.