Climb Scary Worm Tower vs [UPD] Get Fat to Splash
[UPD] Get Fat to Splash currently leads with 1,124 concurrent players against 746, a 1.5× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Climb Scary Worm Tower at 1,283 concurrent players, versus 1,270. Momentum favours Climb Scary Worm Tower: +7.9% week over week versus -1.3% for [UPD] Get Fat to Splash. Lifetime, Climb Scary Worm Tower has more visits (86.3M vs 37.1M). Full side-by-side history for Climb Scary Worm Tower and [UPD] Get Fat to Splash is charted above.
Climb Scary Worm Tower
746
playing now
927 24h peak · 86.3M visits
VS
[UPD] Get Fat to Splash💦
1,124
playing now
1,270 24h peak · 37.1M visits
Player count history
Climb Scary Worm Tower[UPD] Get Fat to Splash
Head to head
| Metric | Climb Scary Worm Tower | [UPD] Get Fat to Splash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 746 | 1,124 | 378 (1.5×) |
| 24h peak | 927 | 1,270 | 343 |
| 24h average | 736 | 1,011 | 275 |
| 7-day peak | 1,265 | 1,270 | 5 |
| 7-day average | 804 | 524 | 280 (1.5×) |
| 30-day peak | 1,265 | 1,270 | 5 |
| All-time peak | 1,283 | 1,270 | 13 |
| 24h change | ▼ 6.4% | ▲ 154.0% | — |
| 7d change | ▲ 7.9% | ▼ 1.3% | — |
| Total visits | 86.3M | 37.1M | 49.2M (2.3×) |
| Visits (24h) | 105.7K | 98.8K | 6.9K |
| Visits (7d) | 865.5K | 372.3K | 493.2K (2.3×) |
| Favorites | 149.8K | 1.9M | 1.7M (12.5×) |
| Rating | 83.2% | 95.2% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #1,642 | #1,279 | of 7,866 |
| Trending score | -23.6 | 266.9 | — |
| Created | Dec 23, 2025 | Feb 25, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Obby & Platformer | Simulation | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 12 days for Climb Scary Worm Tower, 11 for [UPD] Get Fat to Splash.