bLockerman's Minesweeper vs Total Conquest WW2 [Beta]

bLockerman's Minesweeper currently leads with 2,925 concurrent players against 2,138. On all-time peak the record belongs to bLockerman's Minesweeper at 3,080 concurrent players, versus 2,370. Momentum favours Total Conquest WW2 [Beta]: +228.8% week over week versus +14.9% for bLockerman's Minesweeper. Lifetime, bLockerman's Minesweeper has more visits (137.7M vs 2.9M). Full side-by-side history for bLockerman's Minesweeper and Total Conquest WW2 [Beta] is charted above.

bLockerman's Minesweeper
2,925
playing now
3,070 24h peak · 137.7M visits
VS
Total Conquest WW2 [Beta]
2,138
playing now
2,370 24h peak · 2.9M visits

Player count history

bLockerman's MinesweeperTotal Conquest WW2 [Beta]

Head to head

Metric bLockerman's Minesweeper Total Conquest WW2 [Beta]Difference
Playing now2,9252,138787
24h peak3,0702,370700
24h average2,4391,787652
7-day peak3,0712,370701
7-day average2,3011,391910 (1.7×)
30-day peak3,0712,370701
All-time peak3,0802,370710
24h change 5.0% 3.8%
7d change 14.9% 228.8%
Total visits137.7M2.9M134.8M (47.1×)
Visits (24h)333.9K364.8K30.9K
Visits (7d)2.6M2.1M448.2K
Favorites146.3K18.7K127.6K (7.8×)
Rating86.3%90.8%
Global rank (players)#628#850of 7,060
Trending score20.191.0
CreatedNov 1, 2021Jul 29, 2026
GenrePuzzleStrategy

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 10 days for bLockerman's Minesweeper, 9 for Total Conquest WW2 [Beta].

bLockerman's Minesweeper vs Total Conquest WW2 [Beta] — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals