bLockerman's Minesweeper vs Train to Fight

Train to Fight currently leads with 2,897 concurrent players against 1,689, a 1.7× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Train to Fight at 4,040 concurrent players, versus 2,947. Lifetime, Train to Fight has more visits (185.8M vs 135.7M). Full side-by-side history for bLockerman's Minesweeper and Train to Fight is charted above.

bLockerman's Minesweeper
1,689
playing now
2,947 24h peak · 135.7M visits
VS
Train to Fight
2,897
playing now
2,962 24h peak · 185.8M visits

Player count history

bLockerman's MinesweeperTrain to Fight

Head to head

Metric bLockerman's Minesweeper Train to FightDifference
Playing now1,6892,8971,208 (1.7×)
24h peak2,9472,96215
24h average2,0702,459389
7-day peak2,9474,0301,083
7-day average2,0292,612583
30-day peak2,9474,0301,083
All-time peak2,9474,0401,093
24h change 11.8% 4.4%
7d change
Total visits135.7M185.8M50.1M
Visits (24h)343.3K271.7K71.6K
Visits (7d)1.1M756.6K376.1K
Favorites144.8K138.2K6.6K
Rating86.2%91.5%
Global rank (players)#941#592of 4,381
Trending score6.6-19.7
CreatedNov 1, 2021Feb 8, 2025
GenrePuzzleSimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 5 days for bLockerman's Minesweeper, 4 for Train to Fight.

bLockerman's Minesweeper vs Train to Fight — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals