HCBB 9v9 2.0 vs [UPD] Derelict

[UPD] Derelict currently leads with 644 concurrent players against 245, a 2.6× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [UPD] Derelict at 872 concurrent players, versus 528. Lifetime, HCBB 9v9 2.0 has more visits (77.6M vs 25.8M). Full side-by-side history for HCBB 9v9 2.0 and [UPD] Derelict is charted above.

HCBB 9v9 2.0
245
playing now
528 24h peak · 77.6M visits
VS
[UPD] Derelict
644
playing now
872 24h peak · 25.8M visits

Player count history

HCBB 9v9 2.0[UPD] Derelict

Head to head

Metric HCBB 9v9 2.0 [UPD] DerelictDifference
Playing now245644399 (2.6×)
24h peak528872344 (1.7×)
24h average295672377 (2.3×)
7-day peak528872344 (1.7×)
7-day average265655390 (2.5×)
30-day peak528872344 (1.7×)
All-time peak528872344 (1.7×)
24h change 4.6% 11.1%
7d change
Total visits77.6M25.8M51.8M (3.0×)
Visits (24h)35.7K36.1K429
Visits (7d)74.6K51K23.6K
Favorites95.3K491K395.7K (5.2×)
Rating80.4%90.2%
Global rank (players)#2,227#1,492of 4,424
Trending score25.77.1
CreatedOct 25, 2021May 29, 2022
GenreSports & RacingRPG

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 3 days for HCBB 9v9 2.0, 3 for [UPD] Derelict.

HCBB 9v9 2.0 vs [UPD] Derelict — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals