HCBB 9v9 2.0 vs Build to Defend Loot

Build to Defend Loot currently leads with 2,564 concurrent players against 444, a 5.8× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Defend Loot at 2,756 concurrent players, versus 528. Lifetime, Build to Defend Loot has more visits (109.8M vs 77.6M). Full side-by-side history for HCBB 9v9 2.0 and Build to Defend Loot is charted above.

HCBB 9v9 2.0
444
playing now
528 24h peak · 77.6M visits
VS
⚔️Build to Defend Loot
2,564
playing now
2,593 24h peak · 109.8M visits

Player count history

HCBB 9v9 2.0Build to Defend Loot

Head to head

Metric HCBB 9v9 2.0 Build to Defend LootDifference
Playing now4442,5642,120 (5.8×)
24h peak5282,5932,065 (4.9×)
24h average3532,1921,839 (6.2×)
7-day peak5282,6492,121 (5.0×)
7-day average2931,9091,616 (6.5×)
30-day peak5282,6492,121 (5.0×)
All-time peak5282,7562,228 (5.2×)
24h change 40.6% 7.8%
7d change
Total visits77.6M109.8M32.2M
Visits (24h)33.2K276.3K243.1K (8.3×)
Visits (7d)64.8K650.7K585.9K (10.0×)
Favorites95.3K95.4K96
Rating80.4%87.2%
Global rank (players)#1,879#677of 4,381
Trending score48.348.9
CreatedOct 25, 2021Jan 3, 2026
GenreSports & RacingSimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 3 days for HCBB 9v9 2.0, 4 for Build to Defend Loot.

HCBB 9v9 2.0 vs Build to Defend Loot — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals