HCBB 9v9 2.0 vs Virtual Football [ OPEN TESTING]

HCBB 9v9 2.0 currently leads with 479 concurrent players against 423. On all-time peak the record belongs to Virtual Football [ OPEN TESTING] at 1,307 concurrent players, versus 584. Momentum favours HCBB 9v9 2.0: +12.9% week over week versus -43.8% for Virtual Football [ OPEN TESTING]. Lifetime, HCBB 9v9 2.0 has more visits (77.9M vs 3.2M). Full side-by-side history for HCBB 9v9 2.0 and Virtual Football [ OPEN TESTING] is charted above.

HCBB 9v9 2.0
479
playing now
510 24h peak · 77.9M visits
VS
Virtual Football [🔓 OPEN TESTING]
423
playing now
539 24h peak · 3.2M visits

Player count history

HCBB 9v9 2.0Virtual Football [ OPEN TESTING]

Head to head

Metric HCBB 9v9 2.0 Virtual Football [ OPEN TESTING]Difference
Playing now47942356
24h peak51053929
24h average34137332
7-day peak574809235
7-day average31640690
30-day peak5741,307733 (2.3×)
All-time peak5841,307723 (2.2×)
24h change 20.1% 26.0%
7d change 12.9% 43.8%
Total visits77.9M3.2M74.6M (24.0×)
Visits (24h)34.1K70.9K36.8K (2.1×)
Visits (7d)244K646.4K402.4K (2.6×)
Favorites95.5K6.9K88.6K (13.8×)
Rating80.4%81.3%
Global rank (players)#2,102#2,357of 7,866
Trending score18.7-19.8
CreatedOct 25, 2021Jan 24, 2026
GenreSports & RacingSports & Racing

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 10 days for HCBB 9v9 2.0, 12 for Virtual Football [ OPEN TESTING].