HCBB 9v9 2.0 vs Mt. Ben Nevis

HCBB 9v9 2.0 currently leads with 445 concurrent players against 50, a 8.9× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Mt. Ben Nevis at 1,253 concurrent players, versus 584. Momentum favours HCBB 9v9 2.0: +6.4% week over week versus -7.2% for Mt. Ben Nevis. Lifetime, HCBB 9v9 2.0 has more visits (77.9M vs 971.5K). Full side-by-side history for HCBB 9v9 2.0 and Mt. Ben Nevis is charted above.

HCBB 9v9 2.0
445
playing now
527 24h peak · 77.9M visits
VS
Mt. Ben Nevis
50
playing now
1,253 24h peak · 971.5K visits

Player count history

HCBB 9v9 2.0Mt. Ben Nevis

Head to head

Metric HCBB 9v9 2.0 Mt. Ben NevisDifference
Playing now44550395 (8.9×)
24h peak5271,253726 (2.4×)
24h average35843880
7-day peak5741,253679 (2.2×)
7-day average31533419
30-day peak5741,253679 (2.2×)
All-time peak5841,253669 (2.1×)
24h change 8.5% 3.1%
7d change 6.4% 7.2%
Total visits77.9M971.5K76.9M (80.2×)
Visits (24h)37.5K26.3K11.2K
Visits (7d)244.3K122.4K121.9K (2.0×)
Favorites95.5K5.5K90.1K (17.4×)
Rating80.4%86.3%
Global rank (players)#2,146#4,203of 8,283
Trending score32.576.8
CreatedOct 25, 2021Jun 22, 2026
GenreSports & RacingAdventure

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 11 days for HCBB 9v9 2.0, 8 for Mt. Ben Nevis.