HCBB 9v9 2.0 vs []NEED MORE ENERGY

[]NEED MORE ENERGY currently leads with 553 concurrent players against 309, a 1.8Γ— advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to []NEED MORE ENERGY at 560 concurrent players, versus 528. Lifetime, HCBB 9v9 2.0 has more visits (77.6M vs 67M). Full side-by-side history for HCBB 9v9 2.0 and []NEED MORE ENERGY is charted above.

HCBB 9v9 2.0
309
playing now
528 24h peak Β· 77.6M visits
VS
[πŸ‘¨β€πŸŒΎ]⚑NEED MORE ENERGY⚑
553
playing now
560 24h peak Β· 67M visits

Player count history

HCBB 9v9 2.0[]NEED MORE ENERGY

Head to head

Metric HCBB 9v9 2.0 []NEED MORE ENERGYDifference
Playing now309553244 (1.8Γ—)
24h peak52856032
24h average32941990
7-day peak52856032
7-day average279415136
30-day peak52856032
All-time peak52856032
24h changeβ–² 8.6%β–² 8.8%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits77.6M67M10.6M
Visits (24h)34.7K73.5K38.8K (2.1Γ—)
Visits (7d)82.1K91K8.9K
Favorites95.3K130.7K35.4K
Rating80.4%85.3%β€”
Global rank (players)#2,369#1,911of 4,575
Trending score41.62.4β€”
CreatedOct 25, 2021Jun 16, 2024β€”
GenreSports & RacingAdventureβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 3 days for HCBB 9v9 2.0, 2 for []NEED MORE ENERGY.

HCBB 9v9 2.0 vs []NEED MORE ENERGY β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals