HCBB 9v9 2.0 vs [V0.2 PRE-ALPHA] Darkest Hours
[V0.2 PRE-ALPHA] Darkest Hours currently leads with 674 concurrent players against 372, a 1.8× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [V0.2 PRE-ALPHA] Darkest Hours at 1,003 concurrent players, versus 584. Momentum favours HCBB 9v9 2.0: +8.2% week over week versus -12.3% for [V0.2 PRE-ALPHA] Darkest Hours. Lifetime, HCBB 9v9 2.0 has more visits (77.9M vs 15.1M). Full side-by-side history for HCBB 9v9 2.0 and [V0.2 PRE-ALPHA] Darkest Hours is charted above.
HCBB 9v9 2.0
372
playing now
527 24h peak · 77.9M visits
VS
[V0.2 PRE-ALPHA] Darkest Hours
674
playing now
814 24h peak · 15.1M visits
Player count history
HCBB 9v9 2.0[V0.2 PRE-ALPHA] Darkest Hours
Head to head
| Metric | HCBB 9v9 2.0 | [V0.2 PRE-ALPHA] Darkest Hours | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 372 | 674 | 302 (1.8×) |
| 24h peak | 527 | 814 | 287 (1.5×) |
| 24h average | 358 | 626 | 268 (1.7×) |
| 7-day peak | 574 | 917 | 343 (1.6×) |
| 7-day average | 316 | 611 | 295 (1.9×) |
| 30-day peak | 574 | 917 | 343 (1.6×) |
| All-time peak | 584 | 1,003 | 419 (1.7×) |
| 24h change | ▲ 10.8% | ▲ 1.8% | — |
| 7d change | ▲ 8.2% | ▼ 12.3% | — |
| Total visits | 77.9M | 15.1M | 62.8M (5.2×) |
| Visits (24h) | 36.7K | 41.2K | 4.5K |
| Visits (7d) | 244.3K | 326.2K | 81.9K |
| Favorites | 95.5K | 149.8K | 54.2K (1.6×) |
| Rating | 80.4% | 94.4% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #2,607 | #1,950 | of 8,283 |
| Trending score | 31.6 | 6.6 | — |
| Created | Oct 25, 2021 | May 11, 2024 | — |
| Genre | Sports & Racing | Survival | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 11 days for HCBB 9v9 2.0, 13 for [V0.2 PRE-ALPHA] Darkest Hours.