HCBB 9v9 2.0 vs [CBM] HUB

HCBB 9v9 2.0 currently leads with 245 concurrent players against 9, a 27.2× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to HCBB 9v9 2.0 at 584 concurrent players, versus 355. Momentum favours HCBB 9v9 2.0: +8.3% week over week versus -20.7% for [CBM] HUB. Lifetime, HCBB 9v9 2.0 has more visits (77.9M vs 3.1M). Full side-by-side history for HCBB 9v9 2.0 and [CBM] HUB is charted above.

HCBB 9v9 2.0
245
playing now
527 24h peak · 77.9M visits
VS
[CBM] HUB
9
playing now
242 24h peak · 3.1M visits

Player count history

HCBB 9v9 2.0[CBM] HUB

Head to head

Metric HCBB 9v9 2.0 [CBM] HUBDifference
Playing now2459236 (27.2×)
24h peak527242285 (2.2×)
24h average33483251 (4.0×)
7-day peak574281293 (2.0×)
7-day average31373240 (4.3×)
30-day peak574281293 (2.0×)
All-time peak584355229 (1.6×)
24h change 11.7% 12.2%
7d change 8.3% 20.7%
Total visits77.9M3.1M74.8M (25.2×)
Visits (24h)37.2K7.7K29.5K (4.8×)
Visits (7d)245.9K42.3K203.6K (5.8×)
Favorites95.5K1.7K93.8K (54.9×)
Rating80.4%91.7%
Global rank (players)#2,813#5,468of 8,018
Trending score15.820.1
CreatedOct 25, 2021Dec 27, 2023
GenreSports & RacingSports & Racing

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 11 days for HCBB 9v9 2.0, 13 for [CBM] HUB.