HCBB 9v9 2.0 vs Ball Eating Simulator

HCBB 9v9 2.0 currently leads with 342 concurrent players against 236. On all-time peak the record belongs to HCBB 9v9 2.0 at 514 concurrent players, versus 403. Lifetime, Ball Eating Simulator has more visits (116.1M vs 77.6M). Full side-by-side history for HCBB 9v9 2.0 and Ball Eating Simulator is charted above.

HCBB 9v9 2.0
342
playing now
514 24h peak · 77.6M visits
VS
Ball Eating Simulator
236
playing now
403 24h peak · 116.1M visits

Player count history

HCBB 9v9 2.0Ball Eating Simulator

Head to head

Metric HCBB 9v9 2.0 Ball Eating SimulatorDifference
Playing now342236106
24h peak514403111
24h average302302tie
7-day peak514403111
7-day average2622566
30-day peak514403111
All-time peak514403111
24h change 31.3% 23.8%
7d change
Total visits77.6M116.1M38.5M
Visits (24h)32K52.7K20.6K (1.6×)
Visits (7d)53.8K155.5K101.7K (2.9×)
Favorites95.3K6.7M6.7M (70.8×)
Rating80.4%91.8%
Global rank (players)#2,033#2,274of 4,278
Trending score34.840.8
CreatedOct 25, 2021Nov 14, 2023
GenreSports & RacingSimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 2 days for HCBB 9v9 2.0, 4 for Ball Eating Simulator.

HCBB 9v9 2.0 vs Ball Eating Simulator — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals