HCBB 9v9 2.0 vs [] MOUNT RNG

[] MOUNT RNG currently leads with 2,143 concurrent players against 425, a 5.0Γ— advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [] MOUNT RNG at 2,315 concurrent players, versus 514. Lifetime, HCBB 9v9 2.0 has more visits (77.6M vs 68.6M). Full side-by-side history for HCBB 9v9 2.0 and [] MOUNT RNG is charted above.

HCBB 9v9 2.0
425
playing now
514 24h peak Β· 77.6M visits
VS
[🐲] MOUNT RNG
2,143
playing now
2,272 24h peak Β· 68.6M visits

Player count history

HCBB 9v9 2.0[] MOUNT RNG

Head to head

Metric HCBB 9v9 2.0 [] MOUNT RNGDifference
Playing now4252,1431,718 (5.0Γ—)
24h peak5142,2721,758 (4.4Γ—)
24h average3321,9121,580 (5.8Γ—)
7-day peak5142,3151,801 (4.5Γ—)
7-day average2791,9651,686 (7.0Γ—)
30-day peak5142,3151,801 (4.5Γ—)
All-time peak5142,3151,801 (4.5Γ—)
24h changeβ–² 37.2%β–Ό 5.8%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits77.6M68.6M8.9M
Visits (24h)32.3K109.6K77.3K (3.4Γ—)
Visits (7d)60.1K404K343.9K (6.7Γ—)
Favorites95.3K129.7K34.4K
Rating80.4%95.5%β€”
Global rank (players)#1,900#785of 4,381
Trending score44.2-8.8β€”
CreatedOct 25, 2021Aug 25, 2024β€”
GenreSports & RacingSimulationβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 3 days for HCBB 9v9 2.0, 5 for [] MOUNT RNG.

HCBB 9v9 2.0 vs [] MOUNT RNG β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals