HCBB 9v9 2.0 vs [UPD] Total Conquest WW2 [Beta]
[UPD] Total Conquest WW2 [Beta] currently leads with 881 concurrent players against 370, a 2.4× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [UPD] Total Conquest WW2 [Beta] at 994 concurrent players, versus 528. Lifetime, HCBB 9v9 2.0 has more visits (77.6M vs 1M). Full side-by-side history for HCBB 9v9 2.0 and [UPD] Total Conquest WW2 [Beta] is charted above.
HCBB 9v9 2.0
370
playing now
528 24h peak · 77.6M visits
VS
[🔥UPD] Total Conquest WW2 [Beta]
881
playing now
994 24h peak · 1M visits
Player count history
HCBB 9v9 2.0[UPD] Total Conquest WW2 [Beta]
Head to head
| Metric | HCBB 9v9 2.0 | [UPD] Total Conquest WW2 [Beta] | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 370 | 881 | 511 (2.4×) |
| 24h peak | 528 | 994 | 466 (1.9×) |
| 24h average | 334 | 648 | 314 (1.9×) |
| 7-day peak | 528 | 994 | 466 (1.9×) |
| 7-day average | 286 | 484 | 198 (1.7×) |
| 30-day peak | 528 | 994 | 466 (1.9×) |
| All-time peak | 528 | 994 | 466 (1.9×) |
| 24h change | ▲ 32.0% | ▲ 41.5% | — |
| 7d change | — | — | — |
| Total visits | 77.6M | 1M | 76.6M (75.4×) |
| Visits (24h) | 33.7K | 128.1K | 94.4K (3.8×) |
| Visits (7d) | 69K | 308.6K | 239.6K (4.5×) |
| Favorites | 95.3K | 5.4K | 89.9K (17.6×) |
| Rating | 80.4% | 86.6% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #1,941 | #1,309 | of 4,380 |
| Trending score | 39.1 | 90.8 | — |
| Created | Oct 25, 2021 | Jul 29, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Sports & Racing | Strategy | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 3 days for HCBB 9v9 2.0, 4 for [UPD] Total Conquest WW2 [Beta].