HCBB 9v9 2.0 vs Try To Die
Try To Die currently leads with 1,043 concurrent players against 304, a 3.4× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Try To Die at 1,626 concurrent players, versus 584. Momentum favours HCBB 9v9 2.0: +13.0% week over week versus -46.3% for Try To Die. Lifetime, HCBB 9v9 2.0 has more visits (77.9M vs 46.3M). Full side-by-side history for HCBB 9v9 2.0 and Try To Die is charted above.
HCBB 9v9 2.0
304
playing now
510 24h peak · 77.9M visits
VS
Try To Die 💀
1,043
playing now
1,246 24h peak · 46.3M visits
Player count history
HCBB 9v9 2.0Try To Die
Head to head
| Metric | HCBB 9v9 2.0 | Try To Die | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 304 | 1,043 | 739 (3.4×) |
| 24h peak | 510 | 1,246 | 736 (2.4×) |
| 24h average | 314 | 913 | 599 (2.9×) |
| 7-day peak | 574 | 1,246 | 672 (2.2×) |
| 7-day average | 312 | 511 | 199 (1.6×) |
| 30-day peak | 574 | 1,626 | 1,052 (2.8×) |
| All-time peak | 584 | 1,626 | 1,042 (2.8×) |
| 24h change | ▲ 11.0% | ▲ 175.8% | — |
| 7d change | ▲ 13.0% | ▼ 46.3% | — |
| Total visits | 77.9M | 46.3M | 31.5M (1.7×) |
| Visits (24h) | 35.2K | 67.4K | 32.2K (1.9×) |
| Visits (7d) | 245.7K | 296.2K | 50.5K |
| Favorites | 95.5K | 2.3M | 2.2M (23.9×) |
| Rating | 80.4% | 82.3% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #2,772 | #1,481 | of 7,866 |
| Trending score | 1.5 | 222.4 | — |
| Created | Oct 25, 2021 | Apr 13, 2023 | — |
| Genre | Sports & Racing | Puzzle | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 10 days for HCBB 9v9 2.0, 12 for Try To Die.