HCBB 9v9 2.0 vs Lucky Garden Defense

HCBB 9v9 2.0 currently leads with 274 concurrent players against 260. On all-time peak the record belongs to Lucky Garden Defense at 1,162 concurrent players, versus 584. Momentum favours HCBB 9v9 2.0: +13.5% week over week versus -58.8% for Lucky Garden Defense. Lifetime, HCBB 9v9 2.0 has more visits (77.9M vs 652.1K). Full side-by-side history for HCBB 9v9 2.0 and Lucky Garden Defense is charted above.

HCBB 9v9 2.0
274
playing now
510 24h peak · 77.9M visits
VS
[🌻] Lucky Garden Defense
260
playing now
267 24h peak · 652.1K visits

Player count history

HCBB 9v9 2.0Lucky Garden Defense

Head to head

Metric HCBB 9v9 2.0 Lucky Garden DefenseDifference
Playing now27426014
24h peak510267243 (1.9×)
24h average314201113 (1.6×)
7-day peak5745722
7-day average31227339
30-day peak574675101
All-time peak5841,162578 (2.0×)
24h change 9.8% 2.0%
7d change 13.5% 58.8%
Total visits77.9M652.1K77.2M (119.4×)
Visits (24h)35.2K9.7K25.5K (3.6×)
Visits (7d)245.7K105.8K139.9K (2.3×)
Favorites95.5K6.5K89K (14.6×)
Rating80.4%83.6%
Global rank (players)#2,876#2,979of 7,799
Trending score1.5-56.2
CreatedOct 25, 2021Jun 10, 2026
GenreSports & RacingSimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 10 days for HCBB 9v9 2.0, 10 for Lucky Garden Defense.