RIOTFALL [FPS] vs +1 Run for Soccer Legends!
+1 Run for Soccer Legends! currently leads with 3,296 concurrent players against 199, a 16.6× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to +1 Run for Soccer Legends! at 4,769 concurrent players, versus 4,039. Lifetime, RIOTFALL [FPS] has more visits (33.7M vs 1.1M). Full side-by-side history for RIOTFALL [FPS] and +1 Run for Soccer Legends! is charted above.
RIOTFALL [FPS]
199
playing now
1,134 24h peak · 33.7M visits
VS
+1 Run for Soccer Legends! ⚽
3,296
playing now
3,835 24h peak · 1.1M visits
Player count history
RIOTFALL [FPS]+1 Run for Soccer Legends!
Head to head
| Metric | RIOTFALL [FPS] | +1 Run for Soccer Legends! | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 199 | 3,296 | 3,097 (16.6×) |
| 24h peak | 1,134 | 3,835 | 2,701 (3.4×) |
| 24h average | 568 | 2,910 | 2,342 (5.1×) |
| 7-day peak | 3,981 | 4,589 | 608 |
| 7-day average | 831 | 1,848 | 1,017 (2.2×) |
| 30-day peak | 3,981 | 4,589 | 608 |
| All-time peak | 4,039 | 4,769 | 730 |
| 24h change | ▲ 38.5% | ▼ 0.4% | — |
| 7d change | — | — | — |
| Total visits | 33.7M | 1.1M | 32.7M (31.9×) |
| Visits (24h) | 202.7K | 257.3K | 54.5K |
| Visits (7d) | 1.1M | 830.1K | 252K |
| Favorites | 422.9K | 73.2K | 349.7K (5.8×) |
| Rating | 83.7% | 87.9% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #2,998 | #472 | of 8,283 |
| Trending score | -84.9 | 196.5 | — |
| Created | Oct 21, 2021 | Aug 1, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Shooter | Simulation | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 5 days for RIOTFALL [FPS], 6 for +1 Run for Soccer Legends!.