RIOTFALL [FPS] vs BUILD AND HIDE TO SURVIVE
BUILD AND HIDE TO SURVIVE currently leads with 2,985 concurrent players against 219, a 13.6× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to BUILD AND HIDE TO SURVIVE at 4,225 concurrent players, versus 4,039. Lifetime, BUILD AND HIDE TO SURVIVE has more visits (34.3M vs 33.4M). Full side-by-side history for RIOTFALL [FPS] and BUILD AND HIDE TO SURVIVE is charted above.
RIOTFALL [FPS]
219
playing now
486 24h peak · 33.4M visits
VS
BUILD AND HIDE TO SURVIVE
2,985
playing now
3,400 24h peak · 34.3M visits
Player count history
RIOTFALL [FPS]BUILD AND HIDE TO SURVIVE
Head to head
| Metric | RIOTFALL [FPS] | BUILD AND HIDE TO SURVIVE | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 219 | 2,985 | 2,766 (13.6×) |
| 24h peak | 486 | 3,400 | 2,914 (7.0×) |
| 24h average | 329 | 2,789 | 2,460 (8.5×) |
| 7-day peak | 3,981 | 4,131 | 150 |
| 7-day average | 1,365 | 3,104 | 1,739 (2.3×) |
| 30-day peak | 3,981 | 4,131 | 150 |
| All-time peak | 4,039 | 4,225 | 186 |
| 24h change | ▼ 88.0% | ▲ 0.2% | — |
| 7d change | — | ▲ 5.7% | — |
| Total visits | 33.4M | 34.3M | 899.5K |
| Visits (24h) | 69.5K | 226.3K | 156.8K (3.3×) |
| Visits (7d) | 737.8K | 1.8M | 1.1M (2.5×) |
| Favorites | 417.6K | 48.6K | 369K (8.6×) |
| Rating | 83.7% | 81.4% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #2,737 | #508 | of 7,126 |
| Trending score | -188.6 | -34.7 | — |
| Created | Oct 21, 2021 | May 10, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Shooter | Survival | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 2 days for RIOTFALL [FPS], 9 for BUILD AND HIDE TO SURVIVE.