RIOTFALL [FPS] vs Jump To Steal Slime
Jump To Steal Slime currently leads with 1,312 concurrent players against 112, a 11.7× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Jump To Steal Slime at 5,607 concurrent players, versus 4,039. Lifetime, RIOTFALL [FPS] has more visits (33.7M vs 17.5M). Full side-by-side history for RIOTFALL [FPS] and Jump To Steal Slime is charted above.
RIOTFALL [FPS]
112
playing now
1,134 24h peak · 33.7M visits
VS
Jump To Steal Slime 🟢
1,312
playing now
2,708 24h peak · 17.5M visits
Player count history
RIOTFALL [FPS]Jump To Steal Slime
Head to head
| Metric | RIOTFALL [FPS] | Jump To Steal Slime | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 112 | 1,312 | 1,200 (11.7×) |
| 24h peak | 1,134 | 2,708 | 1,574 (2.4×) |
| 24h average | 483 | 1,881 | 1,398 (3.9×) |
| 7-day peak | 3,981 | 3,672 | 309 |
| 7-day average | 811 | 2,181 | 1,370 (2.7×) |
| 30-day peak | 3,981 | 3,672 | 309 |
| All-time peak | 4,039 | 5,607 | 1,568 |
| 24h change | ▼ 5.7% | ▼ 16.7% | — |
| 7d change | — | ▼ 17.5% | — |
| Total visits | 33.7M | 17.5M | 16.2M (1.9×) |
| Visits (24h) | 166.6K | 203.1K | 36.5K |
| Visits (7d) | 1.1M | 1.6M | 521.5K |
| Favorites | 422.9K | 816.3K | 393.4K (1.9×) |
| Rating | 83.7% | 83.4% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #3,455 | #867 | of 8,338 |
| Trending score | -105.7 | -44.6 | — |
| Created | Oct 21, 2021 | Jun 6, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Shooter | Simulation | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 6 days for RIOTFALL [FPS], 13 for Jump To Steal Slime.