(Testing) Squid Game X vs Eat the World

Eat the World currently leads with 2,604 concurrent players against 2,429. On all-time peak the record belongs to Eat the World at 5,261 concurrent players, versus 4,760. Momentum favours (Testing) Squid Game X: +20.5% week over week versus -17.9% for Eat the World. Lifetime, Eat the World has more visits (618.6M vs 121M). Full side-by-side history for (Testing) Squid Game X and Eat the World is charted above.

(Testing) Squid Game X
2,429
playing now
4,389 24h peak · 121M visits
VS
Eat the World
2,604
playing now
3,880 24h peak · 618.6M visits

Player count history

(Testing) Squid Game XEat the World

Head to head

Metric (Testing) Squid Game X Eat the WorldDifference
Playing now2,4292,604175
24h peak4,3893,880509
24h average3,1063,000106
7-day peak4,6594,101558
7-day average3,2703,17991
30-day peak4,6594,294365
All-time peak4,7605,261501
24h change 9.9% 8.0%
7d change 20.5% 17.9%
Total visits121M618.6M497.7M (5.1×)
Visits (24h)534.4K310.8K223.5K (1.7×)
Visits (7d)3.9M2.3M1.6M (1.7×)
Favorites78.6K27.9M27.8M (354.5×)
Rating92.6%94.7%
Global rank (players)#586#565of 8,339
Trending score-17.4-19.4
CreatedSep 27, 2021Feb 22, 2024
GenreParty & CasualSimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for (Testing) Squid Game X, 14 for Eat the World.