Flood Escape 2 vs Roll to Defend
Flood Escape 2 currently leads with 748 concurrent players against 421, a 1.8× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Roll to Defend at 1,563 concurrent players, versus 981. Momentum favours Flood Escape 2: -3.0% week over week versus -54.5% for Roll to Defend. Lifetime, Flood Escape 2 has more visits (596.1M vs 13.9M). Full side-by-side history for Flood Escape 2 and Roll to Defend is charted above.
Flood Escape 2 🌊
748
playing now
873 24h peak · 596.1M visits
VS
Roll to Defend
421
playing now
514 24h peak · 13.9M visits
Player count history
Flood Escape 2Roll to Defend
Head to head
| Metric | Flood Escape 2 | Roll to Defend | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 748 | 421 | 327 (1.8×) |
| 24h peak | 873 | 514 | 359 (1.7×) |
| 24h average | 697 | 406 | 291 (1.7×) |
| 7-day peak | 967 | 831 | 136 |
| 7-day average | 687 | 525 | 162 |
| 30-day peak | 967 | 1,563 | 596 (1.6×) |
| All-time peak | 981 | 1,563 | 582 (1.6×) |
| 24h change | ▲ 11.3% | ▼ 6.7% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 3.0% | ▼ 54.5% | — |
| Total visits | 596.1M | 13.9M | 582.2M (42.9×) |
| Visits (24h) | 73.5K | 31.5K | 41.9K (2.3×) |
| Visits (7d) | 572.3K | 310.9K | 261.4K (1.8×) |
| Favorites | 2.2M | 29.4K | 2.2M (75.4×) |
| Rating | 81.5% | 95.8% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #1,784 | #2,400 | of 7,866 |
| Trending score | 4.0 | -56.7 | — |
| Created | Apr 13, 2017 | May 14, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Obby & Platformer | Simulation | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 12 days for Flood Escape 2, 12 for Roll to Defend.