BAD CAT vs Surf for Lucky Blocks

BAD CAT currently leads with 2,014 concurrent players against 1,231, a 1.6× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Surf for Lucky Blocks at 2,407 concurrent players, versus 2,148. Lifetime, BAD CAT has more visits (369.7M vs 34.6M). Full side-by-side history for BAD CAT and Surf for Lucky Blocks is charted above.

BAD CAT
2,014
playing now
2,148 24h peak · 369.7M visits
VS
Surf for Lucky Blocks
1,231
playing now
2,330 24h peak · 34.6M visits

Player count history

BAD CATSurf for Lucky Blocks

Head to head

Metric BAD CAT Surf for Lucky BlocksDifference
Playing now2,0141,231783 (1.6×)
24h peak2,1482,330182
24h average1,5371,49542
7-day peak2,1482,330182
7-day average1,2681,558290
30-day peak2,1482,330182
All-time peak2,1482,407259
24h change 30.6% 9.8%
7d change
Total visits369.7M34.6M335.1M (10.7×)
Visits (24h)165K174.7K9.7K
Visits (7d)376.9K320.1K56.8K
Favorites1.1M1.4M296.3K
Rating86.5%88.2%
Global rank (players)#751#1,083of 4,380
Trending score66.4-12.7
CreatedAug 30, 2021Mar 31, 2026
GenreRoleplay & Avatar SimSimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 4 days for BAD CAT, 3 for Surf for Lucky Blocks.

BAD CAT vs Surf for Lucky Blocks — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals