BAD CAT vs World at War

World at War currently leads with 1,306 concurrent players against 1,199. On all-time peak the record belongs to BAD CAT at 1,528 concurrent players, versus 1,470. Lifetime, BAD CAT has more visits (369.7M vs 4.6M). Full side-by-side history for BAD CAT and World at War is charted above.

BAD CAT
1,199
playing now
1,528 24h peak · 369.7M visits
VS
World at War
1,306
playing now
1,470 24h peak · 4.6M visits

Player count history

BAD CATWorld at War

Head to head

Metric BAD CAT World at WarDifference
Playing now1,1991,306107
24h peak1,5281,47058
24h average1,2081,22921
7-day peak1,5281,47058
7-day average1,1811,006175
30-day peak1,5281,47058
All-time peak1,5281,47058
24h change 6.2% 53.6%
7d change
Total visits369.7M4.6M365.1M (80.5×)
Visits (24h)156.1K200.8K44.7K
Visits (7d)345.1K427.9K82.8K
Favorites1.1M5.2K1.1M (211.5×)
Rating86.5%79.7%
Global rank (players)#1,185#1,127of 4,381
Trending score6.966.9
CreatedAug 30, 2021May 30, 2026
GenreRoleplay & Avatar SimStrategy

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 4 days for BAD CAT, 4 for World at War.

BAD CAT vs World at War — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals