BAD CAT vs [UPD]Football Legends

BAD CAT currently leads with 1,919 concurrent players against 1,041, a 1.8× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [UPD]Football Legends at 2,161 concurrent players, versus 2,148. Lifetime, BAD CAT has more visits (369.7M vs 127.3M). Full side-by-side history for BAD CAT and [UPD]Football Legends is charted above.

BAD CAT
1,919
playing now
2,148 24h peak · 369.7M visits
VS
[UPD]🏈Football Legends🏈
1,041
playing now
2,161 24h peak · 127.3M visits

Player count history

BAD CAT[UPD]Football Legends

Head to head

Metric BAD CAT [UPD]Football LegendsDifference
Playing now1,9191,041878 (1.8×)
24h peak2,1482,16113
24h average1,5741,266308
7-day peak2,1482,16113
7-day average1,2771,19879
30-day peak2,1482,16113
All-time peak2,1482,16113
24h change 33.7% 93.3%
7d change
Total visits369.7M127.3M242.5M (2.9×)
Visits (24h)170K76.6K93.4K (2.2×)
Visits (7d)381.9K258.1K123.7K
Favorites1.1M89.8K1M (12.2×)
Rating86.5%86.5%
Global rank (players)#772#1,186of 4,425
Trending score73.017.3
CreatedAug 30, 2021Sep 2, 2024
GenreRoleplay & Avatar SimSports & Racing

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 4 days for BAD CAT, 5 for [UPD]Football Legends.

BAD CAT vs [UPD]Football Legends — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals